The newest LSD decide to try indicated that the fresh new top of the curvilinear dating was at brand new 302 pal reputation

The newest LSD decide to try indicated that the fresh new top of the curvilinear dating was at brand new 302 pal reputation

Hypotheses Screening

Hypothesis 1 predicted a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship between the number of friends a profile owner has and observers’ perceptions of the profile owner’s (a) social and (b) physical attractiveness. In order to test these relationships, one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted with number of friends as the independent matchocean tipy variable and social attractiveness and physical attractiveness as the dependent variables. Hypothesis 1a was supported. Results showed a significant quadratic effect for the relationship of number of friends on social attractiveness, F (1, 129) = 2.78, p = .098, ? 2 = .02. 2 2 A statistical significance rule of p < .10 for directional hypothesis tests was employed, given the a priori prediction of the inverted-U curvilinear function (see Levine & Banas, 2002 ). Descriptive statistics appear in Table 1. In order to confirm the direction of the curve, the means were subjected to a post-hoc least significant differences (LSD) test. That is, targets were viewed as most socially attractive when they had 302 friends.

  • Note: Means with different superscripts differ within columns at the p < .05 level.

The partnership anywhere between amount of family members and you can actual attractiveness did not stick to the predict curvilinear dating. All round F therefore the particular take to having quadratic consequences had been not very much, F (step one, 1dos9) = dos.47, p = .119. Theory 1b wasn’t supported. Post-hoc LSD analyses failed to let you know any pairwise variations among four setting (select Table step 1).

Theory 2 forecast a good linear matchmaking between the number of loved ones a visibility holder keeps and observers’ attitudes of the character user’s extraversion. An omnibus one-way ANOVA that have extraversion given that depending varying is actually tall, F (cuatro, 129) = step three.several, p= .02. Yet not, new linear impact given from the H2 was not served, F (step 1, 1dos9) = dos.32, p = .13. Alternatively, a critical quartic perception emerged, F (1, 129) = 5.66, p= .02. Blog post hoc research playing with LSD comparisons presented extreme pairwise distinctions certainly a number of the cells suggesting (a) a beneficial curvilinear ugly-You effect overall, toward highest quantity of extraversion going on on 502 loved ones level. Even though detected extraversion trailed out of beyond the apex, the greater quantities of family members (702 and you may 902) stimulated not less extraversion versus apex. Yet not, a reduced variety of household members (102 otherwise 302) prompted rather lower extraversion judgments as compared to apex of 502 (pick Table step 1 to own over performance). It seems that that have even more members of the family in reality connotes deeper extraversion having Facebook profile citizens, a little because the predicted, however, that the relationship isn’t a direct linear development. By far the most extroverted attributions is relegated to prospects having a heightened-than-mediocre quantity of friends.


The reason for this research was to dictate the kind off the connection anywhere between sociometric signs off connectedness depicted towards the Fb and you may this new societal attractiveness, physical attractiveness, and you will extraversion of your own reputation owner seen from the others. This research posed questions regarding the nature of these matchmaking and you can after that found aftereffects of all the information generated by the newest social media program towards others’ perception of people into the a social networking ecosystem.

Discover a great curvilinear relationships between your amount of nearest and dearest you to definitely character customers try alleged to keeps and you may others’ thinking of their personal appeal. More specifically, on updates where in actuality the profile owner had the fewest nearest and dearest (102), evaluations of the individual’s social elegance had been one of the lowest. Recommendations of person’s societal attractiveness had been highest if the reputation shown your reputation manager got around 300 friends. Beyond one to number of relatives, product reviews away from a profile customer’s societal attractiveness declined to an even approaching the newest 102 household members status. Even though there was zero extreme differences when considering social elegance about extremely lowest and incredibly greatest amount of friends’ conditions, the absolute philosophy of the associated setting try trending from the advice one to implies it is better having too many household members than to have not enough.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *